«
»

Is three festivals too many for one trip?

1001 gelbe Konzertfans

Wacken is set in stone. Party.San is look­ing good.

Would adding Sum­mer Breeze, the week after Party.San, be too ambitious?

Pros: Obit­u­ary are playing.

Cons: After two fes­ti­vals we’re likely to be a bit worn out and ever-so-slightly meh. Not to men­tion prob­a­bly broke.

What do you reckon? Over-ambitious or are we being emo?

Is three fes­ti­vals too ambitious

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 15th, 2009 at 12:56 pm and is filed under festival, travel, woa2010. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “Is three festivals too many for one trip?”

  1. Steff Metal says:
    November 16, 2009 at 2:33 am

    We were doing 3 fes­ti­vals, each a week apart, but the mid­dle one (not a metal fes­ti­val) got cancelled.

    If stuff you really, really want to see is at all fes­ti­vals, I say go for it! If you hate it soooo much, you could always leave early and go explore some­where qui­eter. Have you thought about going to Sum­mer Breeze just the day Obit­u­ary are playing?

  2. goatlady says:
    November 16, 2009 at 7:51 am

    Heh thanks Steff. I would like to at least have a go at it — but it WOULD mean pack­ing up our tent instead of leav­ing it the field!

    I’m sure there’ll be more Sum­mer Breeze announce­ments that will make me squee — I’m just a HUGE Obit fan so it caught my eye :)

  3. Leticia says:
    January 1, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    Three fes­ti­vals isn’t nearly enough!!! If I could do it, I’d do Party.San, Sum­mer Breeze, Wacken, Blood­stock, Tuska, Swe­den Rock, Inferno… the list goes on. Doing them all in one year would be absolutely awesome.